This is a very simple concept, and only a simple explanation will suffice… I pondered trying to write this post using only fifty unique words but I am not sufficiently talented to make “I do not like the righties plan I do not like it Sam I am” adequately detail what I mean…

Our democracy is based on co-equal branches of government, when those branches are held by different parties the government cannot enact new legislation unless the parties can reach a compromise that satisfies both sides. In such a case new legislation might not be possible, too bad, deal with it.

The problem comes when action MUST be taken by the legislative branch to continue the basic functions of the government that these disparate players are supposed to be serving. If inaction is not an option than compromise isn’t just an unpleasant reality it is an absolute necessity. The government of the United States of America cannot be shredded by the refusal of elected representatives to participate. The business of the United States requires that those who would pretend to be worthy of inclusion could put aside ego and ideology for the greater good of the nation, those unwilling to do so prove themselves unworthy of their post… period.

Democracy is not unlike herding kittens, progress is never going to be simple or direct, but there are times that all hands must come together to accomplish that which must be accomplished. Refusing to acknowledge that divided government requires compromise is tantamount to abdication of the concept of Democracy. If you have no use for our government, get the hell out of the way, the citizens of this country require more. A government of, by and for the people can only be hijacked for a limited time, when that time is up the pushback will be swift and harsh.

I could not, would not, ever vote.
For taxes on a great big boat.
I will not vote to raise a tax.
balance on the seniors backs!
Not in the dark! Not in a tree!
Not in a car! You let me be!
We do not like them on the rich.
We do not like them silly bitch.
We will not raise a single tax.
Despite all of your stupid facts.
We do not like them here or there.
We do not like them ANYWHERE!

Seriously, this is the level of discourse from the right, and the country deserves better.

 

I haven’t posted in a while as work and my activities with PLAN have filled practically every waking moment but this cannot pass without my small contribution to promote and amplify a superlative voice brilliantly distilling birtherism into the cold, hard, facts…

This video has some strong language, not that it isn’t warranted. Please take the time to watch… I am willing to bet that you will then be willing to share…

Thank you for your time

 

Republicans gain political advantage by being better at politics than Democrats. This is a cold hard truth that Democrats are loathe to admit, even to themselves. There are two primary methods that Republicans employ to leverage and consolidate their political power: First they speak to wedge issues that are so emotionally powerful that they separate voters from 90% of their interests and well being for the 10% that motivates them emotionally. Secondly, they advocate straw dog solutions to complex issues creating quick, easily repeatable catch phrases that sound like they might be effective even though they rarely would address more than the smallest fraction of the issue they are deployed against.


In the State of the Union last night President Barack Obama tore up half of the Republican playbook, not by disproving or refuting the ridiculous straw dogs that the GOP have used to such great effect for years, he co-opted them, embraced them knowing that they won’t solve anything but also knowing that the quickest way to prove that we require more complete solutions is to include the bumper sticker solutions so that they can no longer be used as an excuse. Several examples are below and I would not be at all surprised if I missed a few…


Straw dog: “America has one of the highest rates of corporate taxes in the industrialized world”

Fact: The largest corporations in America pay nothing even remotely approaching the marginal tax rates.

Obama: Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries. Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change. So tonight, I’m asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system. Get rid of the loopholes. Level the playing field. And use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years – without adding to our deficit.


Straw dog: Freezing spending will be effective at stemming deficits

Fact: Discretionary spending is a small fraction of the budget, cuts or freezes of discretionary spending will have a relatively small impact in relation to the scope of the problem.

Obama: We are living with a legacy of deficit-spending that began almost a decade ago. And in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people’s pockets. But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in. That is not sustainable. Every day, families sacrifice to live within their means. They deserve a government that does the same. So tonight, I am proposing that starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years. This would reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade, and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president. This freeze will require painful cuts. Already, we have frozen the salaries of hardworking federal employees for the next two years. I’ve proposed cuts to things I care deeply about, like community action programs. The Secretary of Defense has also agreed to cut tens of billions of dollars in spending that he and his generals believe our military can do without.


Straw dog: Tort reform will solve skyrocketing health care costs

Fact: Medical malpractice costs and the costs of defensive medicine are a tiny fraction of healthcare spending… Texas has some of the toughest tort reforms and also some of the highest costs per capita for health care.

Obama: Health insurance reform will slow these rising costs, which is part of why nonpartisan economists have said that repealing the health care law would add a quarter of a trillion dollars to our deficit. Still, I’m willing to look at other ideas to bring down costs, including one that Republicans suggested last year: medical malpractice reform to rein in frivolous lawsuits.


Straw dog: Small government is better government.

Fact: Size doesn’t matter, it really is about being effective.

Obama: Let me take this one step further. We shouldn’t just give our people a government that’s more affordable. We should give them a government that’s more competent and efficient. We cannot win the future with a government of the past.


Straw dog: Elite Democrats have no respect for the military, not with their policy and not in their institutions of higher education

Fact: Repeal of DADT proved that Democrats respect the service of ALL those who put on the uniform

Obama: Our troops come from every corner of this country – they are black, white, Latino, Asian and Native American. They are Christian and Hindu, Jewish and Muslim. And, yes, we know that some of them are gay. Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love. And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation.

Straw dog: Earmarks are evil and wasteful

Fact: Earmarks are a tool, they are only as evil as the user, also they are a tiny fraction of spending

Obama: And because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren’t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: if a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.


Straw dog: Elites like the President that find fault with America, hate America.

Fact: Caring enough to acknowledge our faults and work to perfect the Union has been the work of patriots for more than 200 years.

Obama: And yet, as contentious and frustrating and messy as our democracy can sometimes be, I know there isn’t a person here who would trade places with any other nation on Earth.


By embracing the Republicans ridiculous talking points the GOP is left with nothing to be for… They had nothing before but now it is blindingly apparent.

 

The GOP used reconciliation to pass the so called “Bush tax cuts”. In order to utilize the process of reconciliation, the GOP was forced to insert a sunset clause because the rules of the Senate don’t allow the reconciliation to be used if the underlying legislation will increase the budget deficit beyond ten years…  Let that sink in for a moment. The GOP knew, absolutely knew that the “Bush tax cuts” would have a negative impact on the deficit and the debt. They gamed the system using techniques that they vilified to the point of hysteria during the health care debate even when they knew that it was fiscally irresponsible. They knew it, and they did it anyway…

They passed the tax cuts knowing that the tax cuts would wipe out the surpluses of the Clinton era.

They passed the tax cuts knowing that a disproportionate benefit was given to the wealthy.

They passed the tax cuts knowing that the national debt would increase despite claiming it a primary concern.

They passed the tax cuts and once again told the Average American that they can have a crumb while giving the whole damn cake to the rich.

If the GOP believed or had any credible evidence that the Bush tax cuts would not negatively impact the deficit and the debt, then why put the sunset measures in the bill in the first place? Don’t bother attempting an answer, despite the talking points, the GOP knew that the Bush tax cuts would explode the debt, they were told so and they acted accordingly all the while spewing the same old crap that Americans have swallowed for decades.

The current administration has not had the luxury of choice, the economic crisis dealt most of the cards that the administration has had to play, and yet THIS administration was able to cut the deficit in the worst recession since the depression.

So first the GOP passes irresponsible tax cuts that they KNEW were going to have a negative impact on the deficit and now the GOP says that it is irresponsible to raise taxes in a recession, that is pretty damn convenient… Functionally the GOP is saying that they were knowingly irresponsible, but the only responsible path to to double down on stupid…

Do NOT let a single Republican continue spewing the fantasy that these tax cuts will spur the economy to the point that revenue will overcome deficit pressures. The GOP knows it isn’t true, of course that won’t stop them from saying it is so…

It is time that persons of good conscience step up and have adult conversations about adult matters. Priorities must be set and policy needs to be crafted to reach those priorities. The stakes are too high to not demand that our representation in Washington D.C. cut the demonstrably false talking points and get serious about governance, it has to be a priority, we have to make sure it remains a priority.

Republicans don’t believe the things they say, they believe the things they say will get them elected. Eventually the truth will catch up to them, believe me.

Nov 112010
 

Can the Democrats put aside their pathological fear of being simultaneously right and politically potent at the same time? Yes we can.

Is it possible to do the right thing and reap the political benefit of the Republicans getting it completely wrong and looking like the uberwealthy lapdogs that they truly are? Yes we can.

Could it be that the Democrats can do that which is necessary for the betterment of the country and NOT be forced to fall on their swords for the effort? Yes we can!

And how is this perfect storm of political nirvana possible? The George W. Bush tax cuts, passed (or shall I say jammed down our throats) by the Republicans leveraging the slimmest of margins using the most reviled process in democracy known to man, aka reconciliation, are, at long last expiring.

The damage of these tax cuts, two unfunded wars, Medicare part D and reckless deregulation of the financial industry will take its toll on the deficit for years, but the 700 billion given away to the wealthiest 2% of earners need not and should not continue.

True American patriots are willing to sacrifice to secure the future of the nation, if that means that I need to give up MY tax cut to force the wealthiest 2% to step up, so be it. I would rather pay more than see the people that have gained more than any other segment in the last decade shirk their responsibility to the nation that has blessed them with such fortune. I will stand up to secure our children’s future, their education the infrastructure that will make their American Dream a possibility.

I cannot and will not accept that those who are most fortunate among us cannot relieve a portion of the burden for the nation that has rewarded them so generously. I will accept the necessity to pay more myself if it means that they will not dodge this responsibility. I will not accept an extension of the tax cuts for these individuals for one moment beyond the sunset that the Republicans set when they kneecapped the budget for this foray in fiscal irresponsibility. I will not accept an extension for two years, or one year, or six months, or six minutes.

If Democrats believe that the “politics” of keeping the tax cuts for the middle class and letting them expire for the wealthiest Americans is too hard I have a suggestion… Do nothing. The tax cuts will expire and the Democrats will be responsible for plugging a huge hole in the deficit.  If the Democrats feel like “do nothing” is just too “Republican” try this, pass a tax cut for people earning less than 250k in the lame duck session and let the “Bush” tax cuts die with the legacy.

The point is this, there is a line that the democratic base will not cross, we are marching right up to it and it is desperately important that our representation both in the Congress and the White House understand… We WILL accept our responsibility and pay more if we must, we WILL NOT accept the most fortunate or you shirking your responsibility… Really, we will NOT.

 

Jon Stewart wrapped up the Rally for Sanity with an interesting if irrelevant analogy… He equated the American people cooperating with each other by the traffic entering a tunnel going into New York city. The idea is that we cooperate with each other to achieve a common goal because we all have to merge for any of us to merge, we all have to get to work and collect a paycheck, we all have to plow our way through the tunnel… Except we ALL don’t. There are a select few that are swept by helicopter to the rooftop of the building they need to be at minutes before they need to arrive. They don’t sweat the commute on a daily basis, they spend tens of thousands of dollars per week to stay in the city in the lap of luxury should their schedules require it.

The reason that Stewart’s analogy fails is that there really is a philosophical difference with how the left and the right approach the role of government and ultimately how that philosophy manifests their actions and policies… The left still believes that government can perform vital and necessary functions for the American populace. The right is convinced that only the private sector can rule the world and in the last thirty years they have almost completely relegated control to corporate interests… The brutal truth is that “you go and then I’ll go” is really the fleecing of the American people by the most powerful companies in the world:

Wellpoint and then Halliburton – You go and then I’ll go…

Mosanto and then BP – You go and then I’ll go…

Exxon-Mobil and then Wal-Mart – You go and then I’ll go…

Merck and then Wells Fargo – You go and then I’ll go…

You go and then I’ll go, you go and then I’ll go.

When will we go? When will we recognize the American dream were being sold now is stamped “made in China”? Corporations in a global economy are global… Government of, by and for the people is OF, BY AND FOR THE PEOPLE!

The realization of Republican economic policies has the American people being repeatedly slapped by the largest, most profitable and powerful corporations that do business in this nation… You go and then I’ll go, you go and then I’ll go.

Sanity was not restored Oct. 30th 2010, it was not evident Nov. 2 2010, it is not likely to return in the near future…

I will however struggle with all my might to bring it back. I will blog, discuss, tweet, argue. You can too, have a conversation, diffuse a delusion. I’ll spread the truth and you can too.

You go and then I’ll go, you go and then I’ll go.

 

The day began about like you would expect a day to begin, provided you planned that day to attend a presidential rally near downtown of the most sprawling metropolis in the United States… Up at 5:00 to get out of the house by 6:00, a quick bite at the Original House of Pancakes to carb load ahead of what was sure to be a grueling day. A quick check of Google maps while traversing the 22 fwy lead us to choose the 91 to the 110 instead of coming up the 5 to the 10 which was my original plan. Traffic cooperated and the next thing you know we were parking in structure a few blocks from the venue, 8:00 A.M. and I’m feeling pretty damn good about things.

The feeling didn’t last, as we turned at Jefferson and headed for the entrance a volunteer said “just down there, you can’t miss the ginormous line”.  We couldn’t miss it. As we walked along the line trying reach the end we realized the line was almost growing at the pace we were walking, a quick shift of gears got us a place but just a few minutes later the end of the line was more than a hundred yards back. I began to wonder if I had been too casual about the timing, I didn’t come to watch the President on the Jumbotron, I was here to see him speak, to experience the energy of others, to engage people about what brought them, what hopes, fears, aspirations, disappointments or desires lead them to be at this rally.

Ten minutes into our time in line volunteers with Organizing for America were getting people fired up by chanting “Fired up”? I have never been the bashful type so I was eager to lend my voice to the hype. Twenty minutes into our line time OFA volunteers came around asking for volunteers to make phone calls while waiting in line, calls to encourage voters to the polls and ask for support. Mrs. Paine has phone banked for Obama on many occasions and we immediately stepped up to get our call sheets. Precisely at 9:00 we started dialing the numbers on the sheet, a few calls in we were approached by another volunteer of OFA who was so pleased to see that we were making the calls she presented us with a pair of blue tickets and said “Come with me”…

The blue and green ticket line was a whole different deal; we were maybe four or five hundred people from the entrance and completely flabbergasted at our good fortune. The other striking thing about the line was the company. Everyone in the line had been pulled from the general line for making calls, exhibiting enthusiasm, wonder or some other attribute that caught the volunteer’s attention while interacting with the crowd. Though the general line was fun, this line was populated by people who were literally thrilled to be there, and willing to share their joy with everyone around them. If we didn’t get anything more from the day than the opportunity to spend time talking to these people the day would have been a complete success.

Entering the venue we were herded through the metal detectors and down the walkway marked “Blue Tickets” which to our amazement and delight placed us directly in front of the podium perhaps thirty-five feet away from where the President would speak in just a few hours.

Standing in very close proximity to lots of people for several hours is about as close to the perfect hell for me as you can get, but this crowd’s enthusiasm made it significantly better than bearable. A few striking moments:

The eruption of applause when members of the LAPD were spotted in force on top of the building directly behind where the President would speak.

The cooperation in the passing of water bottles to make sure that those in the crowd in need had something to drink.

The woman who briefly passed out while Ozomatli was performing, EMT’s were called by USC personnel in the crowd but the woman staunchly refused to leave preferring to pour a bottle of water over her head and neck and stand her ground.

The moment when no less than ten people in my immediate area spontaneously burst into tears when the Presidents helicopter passed over, the excitement was visceral and very touching to witness.

Speakers included Antonio Villaraigosa, Kal Penn, Hilda Solis, Kamala Harris, Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer, Jamie Foxx did a fine job whipping up the crowd but the real standouts were Denise Eger the President of the Southern California Board of Rabbis and Marquis Olison with Organizing for America.

Denise offered the most inclusive prayer I have ever heard touching upon the tragic suicides that have resulted in the bullying of the LGBT community. I was very pleased to have the opportunity to shake her hand when exiting the venue and to thank her for her stirring remarks.

Marquis is simply wonderful, he inspires passion in people by displaying his abundant passion for the cause. I would not be at all surprised if OFA_CA doesn’t get many new volunteers based on the strength of his words.

Watching the President of the United States speak from a distance of thirty-five feet is quite simply an awesome experience. The President has a presence that fills up a stage and draws in a crowd. The remarks were not new, the themes familiar, the stories are updated but we’ve heard them before, the content of the remarks was quite simply not the point.

The energy that the President brought to the gathered thousands in the final days before the election was only a portion of the dynamic I witnessed at this rally. The American people give a President his power by virtue of the vote. These people give this President a portion of his power by virtue of their hope, aspirations, admiration and love. We need him to energize the electorate to get involved, get excited and get out the vote, but he needs us too, he is not invincible, he has one of the hardest jobs in the world in one of the hardest times in decades and he is doing it in the shadow of obstruction, division and racism. The energy that the President draws when speaking to people who are passionate about the future of the country is apparent and restorative. The President is no doubt exhausted, the pressures of office are enormous and the pressures of the politics to make governance possible have to be crushing but what I saw yesterday was a rally of spirit that mutually benefitted the participants and that ultimately was the point

Thank you Mr. President for the inspiration, hope we were able to give a little back to you.

 

Bringing financial reform to the floor of the Senate has been filibustered by the Party of no, even though a scant 19 months ago the financial industry threatened to plunge the world into a global depression. It was only the extraordinary actions taken by the Bush administration with the backing of the Democratic Party that staunched a much wider crisis. It was only the continued vigilance and bold stimulus of the Obama administration that thwarted a deeper and more painful recession saving the American people from the worst of the devastation while necessarily re-capitalizing firms that recklessly drove the banking system to the brink of disaster.

And what do those who bothered to pull the financial system out of the fire have to show for their responsibility in the face of a most unpleasant task? The teaparty. An unruly, angry, misinformed mob that wants to punish those who pulled us out of the fire while granting a pass to the GOP for doing nothing then and doing less now to reign in those who actually set up and knocked down the American economy to the detriment of practically the entire electorate.

The President released the following after the unfortunate vote in the Senate today:

“I am deeply disappointed that Senate Republicans voted in a block against allowing a public debate on Wall Street reform to begin.  Some of these Senators may believe that this obstruction is a good political strategy, and others may see delay as an opportunity to take this debate behind closed doors, where financial industry lobbyists can water down reform or kill it altogether.  But the American people can’t afford that.  A lack of consumer protections and a lack of accountability on Wall Street nearly brought our economy to its knees, and helped cause the pain that has left millions of Americans without jobs and without homes.  The reform that both parties have been working on for a year would prevent a crisis like this from happening again, and I urge the Senate to get back to work and put the interests of the country ahead of party.”

It is time for fact to trump fiction, for talking points to give way to public debate for the good of the American people, if you haven’t the chops to have the debate in that forum than we shall continue to understand that your political future is far more important to you than the future of the country, its people and their financial security.

 

Well America it is tax day and suffice it to say that this day among all days in the calendar inflames the passions of those who pay taxes, those who avoid taxes, those who benefit from taxes and those who feel abused by taxes.

This particular tax day was brought into sharp contrast for me when I had a minor Twitter kerfuffle about tax breaks for small and large companies in America.

My instincts lean towards more tax breaks for small companies and fewer for the large strictly on the basis of the assumption that large companies are already very well represented and therefore have more advantage built into the system than small companies. The surprise for me was when I received via twitter the following challenge “if large companies have income freed up, they hire new employees. Not political. FACTUAL.” I did not even take a moment to think before I replied from what I knew to be true from twenty plus years in the trenches of making small businesses survive in the real economy… Companies hire on demand, profit has NOTHING to do with the acquisition of personnel.

It may be true that companies will retain personnel longer in a down economy based on the profitability of the company but the notion that a company will hire additional personnel due to tax incentives that increase profitability is not only wrong it is insulting to anyone that has ever run a business, large or small.

“Trickle down” economics is an insult to thinking people everywhere the only possible benefit is in a moderate slowdown where the financial windfall could forestall the severance of employees in a recession mild enough that such a delay might blunt the dip to the point of insignificance… or in other words, trickle down only works to save jobs on the way down, not to create them on the way back up.

The argument that large companies cannot afford to pay their fair share in the way of taxes to this nation that is so good to them washes only as a measure of triage, the rest of the time the tax benefit will find its way into the bonuses of the executives that negotiated the tax break, not into the employment of someone who could add to real economy of the nation.

 

The conservative half of the political spectrum pretty much had a heart attack when Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace prize. They were aghast that such an honor be bestowed upon one that had only just arrived on the national stage. And even though the President received the award with these words…

“I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations – that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.

And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history who have received this prize – Schweitzer and King; Marshall and Mandela – my accomplishments are slight. And then there are the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice; those who toil in humanitarian organizations to relieve suffering; the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened of cynics. I cannot argue with those who find these men and women – some known, some obscure to all but those they help – to be far more deserving of this honor than I.”

There were many that ridiculed the choice despite the language that the Nobel Committee cited in their recognition of Obama.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama’s initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world’s leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama’s appeal that “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.”

In hindsight of the historic Nuclear Security Summit it seems that the Nobel Committee was prescient. I’m betting that the right doesn’t bother to acknowledge the utter brilliance of the choice now.

h/t @geolarson2

© 2011 My Take Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha